{"id":880,"date":"2020-10-12T10:48:56","date_gmt":"2020-10-12T10:48:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.aspertic.org\/?p=880"},"modified":"2023-01-18T08:48:32","modified_gmt":"2023-01-18T08:48:32","slug":"revision-resoluciones-firmes-por-no-adaptarse-a-la-ley-ue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/2020\/10\/12\/revision-resoluciones-firmes-por-no-adaptarse-a-la-ley-ue\/","title":{"rendered":"14. La revisi\u00f3 de les Resolucions fermes per no adaptar-se a la jurisprud\u00e8ncia de la UE"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"880\" class=\"elementor elementor-880\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-1c660642 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"1c660642\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-49e434ed\" data-id=\"49e434ed\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-54423cd4 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"54423cd4\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div style=\"text-align: justify; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">\r\n\r\n<strong>CONCLUSIONS OF THE OPINION: The force of the resolutions of the CJEU is analysed in order to proceed to the review of final judgements and administrative decisions.<\/strong>\r\n\r\n<strong>FIRST.-<\/strong> The Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has had to rule in recent years on the strength of its own case law to force a review of national judgements that have become res judicata.\r\n\r\n<strong>SECOND.-<\/strong> European law does not, theoretically, require that erroneous administrative or judicial decisions be reviewed once they have become final. However, it is our understanding that, if the four conditions listed above are met, review is mandatory.\r\n\r\n<strong>THIRD.-<\/strong> It does not matter that the litigant did not invoke the applicable European Union law. What matters is that the court which heard the case at last instance did in fact examine the question of European Union law, or was able to do so of its own motion.\r\n\r\n<strong>FOURTH.-<\/strong> It is not necessary, in order to trigger the review that is imposed by European Union law, that the request for review be made immediately. It is sufficient to comply with the deadline set by national law.\r\n\r\n<strong>FIFTH.-<\/strong> The ECJ prefers that the way in which the law is enforced be through the means of challenge available under national law, provided that the system does not impose excessive constraints or burdens in order to assert the primacy of that law.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-b1a63d5 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"b1a63d5\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-8813ffc\" data-id=\"8813ffc\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-13eb569 elementor-post-navigation-borders-yes elementor-widget elementor-widget-post-navigation\" data-id=\"13eb569\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"post-navigation.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-post-navigation\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Post Navigation\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-post-navigation__prev elementor-post-navigation__link\">\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/2020\/10\/12\/13-the-right-not-to-submit-documents-after-directive-2019-1937\/\" rel=\"prev\"><span class=\"post-navigation__arrow-wrapper post-navigation__arrow-prev\"><i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"fas fa-angle-left\"><\/i><span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Prev<\/span><\/span><span class=\"elementor-post-navigation__link__prev\"><span class=\"post-navigation__prev--label\">Previous<\/span><\/span><\/a>\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-post-navigation__separator-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-post-navigation__separator\"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-post-navigation__next elementor-post-navigation__link\">\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/2020\/10\/12\/analisis-riesgos-certezas-cookies\/\" rel=\"next\"><span class=\"elementor-post-navigation__link__next\"><span class=\"post-navigation__next--label\">Next<\/span><\/span><span class=\"post-navigation__arrow-wrapper post-navigation__arrow-next\"><i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"fas fa-angle-right\"><\/i><span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Next<\/span><\/span><\/a>\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CONCLUSIONES DEL DICTAMEN: Se analiza la fuerza de las resoluciones del TJUE para proceder a la revisi\u00f3n de las sentencias y resoluciones administrativas firmes PRIMERA.- El Tribunal de Justicia de la Uni\u00f3n Europea (TJUE) ha tenido que pronunciarse en los \u00faltimos a\u00f1os acerca de la fuerza de su propia jurisprudencia para forzar la revisi\u00f3n de [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1159,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2022\/11\/derechoeu.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=880"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/880\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2380,"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/880\/revisions\/2380"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aspertic.org\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}