Sitemap

CONCLUSIONS OF THE OPINION: European Directive 2019/1937 the revolution in the jurisdiction The visibility of the fact that Justice is a shared competence, and that judges are previously European rather than Spanish, with all that this implies. FIRST.- Justice is Read more…

CONCLUSIONS OF THE OPINION: Scope of the EU’s sovereignty, competence and jurisdiction with reference to the Spanish state in application of the EU Directive 2019/1937 One of the first things that surprises us is the declaration of sovereignty over many Read more…

CONCLUSIONS OF THE OPINION: The figures of the investigator, the reporting person, the concerned person and the facilitator in the EU Directive 2019/1937. The regulation creates new figures that play a decisive role. FIRST.- The figure in charge of the Read more…

CONCLUSIONS OF THE OPINION: Mailboxes and channels of complaint, technical-legal aspects of mailboxes or internal channels of complaint, of the directive 1937/2019 EC. This paper explores how complaint boxes should be set up in practice, the procedure to be followed Read more…

CONCLUSIONS OF THE OPINION: What does the whistleblower directive amend?, an explosion within Union law. This third opinion analyses both the Union’s strategies, which involve the entire administration, including the judiciary and the military, and the impact on practice of Read more…

DIRECTIVE, MAILBOXES, COMPLAINT CHANNELS AND SCOPE OF INFLUENCE OPINION CONCLUSIONS Directive, complaint channels and scope of influence. This second opinion deals in more detail with the social, political and legal changes that the implementation of the Directive will bring about Read more…

CONCLUSIONS OF THE OPINION: Directive EU/2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of individuals who report infringements of Union law (Whistleblowers Directive), an overview. This opinion provides an overview of the Read more…